Jin Hyung Lee, Remy Durand, Viviana Gradinaru, Feng Zhang, Inbal Goshen, Dae-Shik Kim, Lief E. Fenno, Charu Ramakrishnan & Karl Deisseroth
Despite a rapidly-growing scientific and clinical brain imaging literature based on functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) using blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD)1 signals, it remains controversial whether BOLD signals in a particular region can be caused by activation of local excitatory neurons2. This difficult question is central to the interpretation and utility of BOLD, with major significance for fMRI studies in basic research and clinical applications3. Using a novel integrated technology unifying optogenetic4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 control of inputs with high-field fMRI signal readouts, we show here that specific stimulation of local CaMKII?-expressing excitatory neurons, either in the neocortex or thalamus, elicits positive BOLD signals at the stimulus location with classical kinetics. We also show that optogenetic fMRI (ofMRI) allows visualization of the causal effects of specific cell types defined not only by genetic identity and cell body location, but also by axonal projection target. Finally, we show that ofMRI within the living and intact mammalian brain reveals BOLD signals in downstream targets distant from the stimulus, indicating that this approach can be used to map the global effects of controlling a local cell population. In this respect, unlike both conventional fMRI studies based on correlations14 and fMRI with electrical stimulation that will also directly drive afferent and nearby axons, this ofMRI approach provides causal information about the global circuits recruited by defined local neuronal activity patterns. Together these findings provide an empirical foundation for the widely-used fMRI BOLD signal, and the features of ofMRI define a potent tool that may be suitable for functional circuit analysis as well as global phenotyping of dysfunctional circuitry.
…What happens if you drive a whole bunch of inhibitory neurons? Are those sufficient to produce an fMRI signal despite their numerical sparseness (~20% in the cortex) relative to excitatory neurons? And thus could an fMRI response occur even if the predominant activity is inhibitory?
Of course activating a bunch of inhibitory neurons would end up activating some excitatory neurons by rebound spiking or whatever, but it’d still be interesting to see.
Agree or Disagree
4
0
I believe they did perform the study with a set of optogenetically activated inhibitory neurons, differentiated by the presence of CAMKII (the excitatory neurons) and parvabulmin (inhibitory). They then got a “zone of negative BOLD, characteristic of a GABA phenotype”. I wonder if these results might someday be applied to interpretation of the BOLD signal via the analysis of the positive signal as a combination or ratio of positive and negative signaling. It is certainly exciting to see the Deisseroth group continue to apply optogenetics in such novel ways.
Agree or Disagree
1
0